Jon Springer is a writer in Brooklyn. Mets by the Numbers began as a goof in 1998, later became a book, then went back to being a goof.
View all posts by Jon Springer
One thought on “And That’s What Happens to Guys Who Wear No. 6”
I’ll post more on this
Submitted by Jon Springer on Sat, 03/29/2008 – 1:12pm.
I’ll post more on this later, just testing comments here.
delete edit reply report to Mollom
Although I predicted #28
Submitted by Ranjrz5 on Sat, 03/29/2008 – 6:40pm.
Although I predicted #28 earlier, perhaps this move will free up #6 for Fernando Martinez…
delete edit reply report to Mollom
No. 6 is always
Submitted by Jon Springer on Sat, 03/29/2008 – 10:46pm.
No. 6 is always theoretically available.
delete edit reply report to Mollom
#6 better not be Fernando
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 03/30/2008 – 12:55pm.
#6 better not be Fernando Martinez number. If the mets want to give him a low number then 2,3,9 would be better. I still say give him 24
delete edit reply report to Mollom
Wouldn’t be surprised if
Submitted by Gene F. (not verified) on Sun, 03/30/2008 – 1:05pm.
Wouldn’t be surprised if they’re fitting Brady Clark for 6 as we speak. I don’t think he’s getting 15 back.
delete edit reply report to Mollom
Brady Clark will suit up in
Submitted by Matthew (not verified) on Sun, 03/30/2008 – 1:19pm.
Brady Clark will suit up in #44
delete edit reply report to Mollom
Brady Clark will suit up in
Submitted by Matthew (not verified) on Sun, 03/30/2008 – 1:19pm.
Brady Clark will suit up in #44
delete edit reply report to Mollom
Thanks for the updates, will
Submitted by Jon Springer on Sun, 03/30/2008 – 7:49pm.
Thanks for the updates, will have a new roster up shortly.
I’ll post more on this
Submitted by Jon Springer on Sat, 03/29/2008 – 1:12pm.
I’ll post more on this later, just testing comments here.
delete edit reply report to Mollom
Although I predicted #28
Submitted by Ranjrz5 on Sat, 03/29/2008 – 6:40pm.
Although I predicted #28 earlier, perhaps this move will free up #6 for Fernando Martinez…
delete edit reply report to Mollom
No. 6 is always
Submitted by Jon Springer on Sat, 03/29/2008 – 10:46pm.
No. 6 is always theoretically available.
delete edit reply report to Mollom
#6 better not be Fernando
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 03/30/2008 – 12:55pm.
#6 better not be Fernando Martinez number. If the mets want to give him a low number then 2,3,9 would be better. I still say give him 24
delete edit reply report to Mollom
Wouldn’t be surprised if
Submitted by Gene F. (not verified) on Sun, 03/30/2008 – 1:05pm.
Wouldn’t be surprised if they’re fitting Brady Clark for 6 as we speak. I don’t think he’s getting 15 back.
delete edit reply report to Mollom
Brady Clark will suit up in
Submitted by Matthew (not verified) on Sun, 03/30/2008 – 1:19pm.
Brady Clark will suit up in #44
delete edit reply report to Mollom
Brady Clark will suit up in
Submitted by Matthew (not verified) on Sun, 03/30/2008 – 1:19pm.
Brady Clark will suit up in #44
delete edit reply report to Mollom
Thanks for the updates, will
Submitted by Jon Springer on Sun, 03/30/2008 – 7:49pm.
Thanks for the updates, will have a new roster up shortly.