MBTN reader Steve P writes:

Quick question....noticed that Mitchell & Ness created a 1965 Tug McGraw replica jersey with number 56 on the back ... I checked with your site and noticed that McGraw never wore that number. While I guess it is possible that M&N created a replica spring training jersey (they've done that with St. Patrick's Day jerseys), it seems odd for them to do so (they could have produced a McGraw with the more familiar 45 and still included the World's Fair patch).  Any idea what M&N was thinking?

As I told Steve, I'm not entirely sure but would guess they'd made a simple mistake. I seem to recall a photo of Tug appearing in 56 make its way into circulation through a yearbook or baseball card from that era, and it was not at all unusual for those shots to be taken during spring training. Further research led me to a discussion forum here where for what it's worth, a writer says they checked with Mitchell & Ness who confirmed their replica is based on a spring training model. You'd think for $275 bucks you'd get the real thing but jerseys ain't my cup of meat.

Just what McGraw was doing in any number in 1965 has always been a little more intriguing a mystery. After all he was only 20 years old then, and wouldn't stick in the majors to stay until 1969. The answer has to do with the way baseball's rules treated first-year players at the time: In an effort to put an artificial drag on bonuses, those players not promoted to the big-league club after their first year were subject to a special draft.

With the Mets still early in the talent-assembly game they took no chances. McGraw was among five 1964 signees who cracked the team in 1965. Ron Swoboda, 21; Kevin Collins, 19; Danny Napoleon, 23; and Jim Bethke, 18, were the others. McGraw, whose developing screwball brought him surprising early success, would return to the development pipeline -- and wait out military service requirements and injuries -- before arriving for good. And though he was always in No. 45, the Mets reissued the No. 45 jersey twice during the periods following McGraw's debut: In 1966 for Darryl Sutherland and in 1968 for Bill Connors.

* * *

Good read in Sunday's Daily News catching up with Jon Matlack, the hard-throwing, hard-luck lefty of the 1970s. I remember Matlack as a master of broken bats who threw hard inside stuff, didn't walk many, and could ring up the whiffs: It's a mystery he wasn't more successful.

Nobody asked, but were it up to me I'd try to make a deal with Mark Teixeira, trade Carlos Delgado to Toronto for pitching/bullpen/bench help, and somehow make Brian Schneider a backup catcher. Improving the offense is important. If Tex costs too much buy the cheaper of Fuentes or Rodriguez, or take your chances with the guys you get in trades. Somebody's going to pitch in the ninth inning.

Despite all you hear of Omar's rep as whacky wheeler-dealer, he's probably going to play it considerably safer. Blowing his wad for the closer first is one of those moves that won't get criticized considering how impovrished everyone thinks the bullpen is,and will excuse him for doing much more. Just saying, it's probably not the cleverest thing he could do.

Citibank's on the brink of collapse? How appropriate!

I have no idea what will happen this offseason but I'll tell you this. I'm sitting here hoping the Mets just don't throw the most money at the guy with the most saves, which is what they did the last time and look where it got them: Feeling pressure to throw the most money at the guy with the most saves, and still on the hook for $10 million, and still looking for a championship. You're just asking for it.

So I'm thinking, if you're going to go after a guy with closing experience, it may as well be Brian Fuentes, who lacks the Sex Appeal of K-Rod but just might get it done cheaper and wouldn't be such a name brand diva that you couldn't slide him into a set-up role if things go bad. And you know they might. Meantime while it'd be nice if they brought in a few good arms as well I hope what they're really learning is that when building a bullpen, like building a bench, begins with turning the earth and fresh seeds every year.

Besides we already have a No. 57.

For the rotation they should just go sign Oliver Perez again.

I wish I had a better handle on how they're going to help the offense but without knowing what they might expect from Church and Castillo, not to mention Daniel Murphy, next year, my guess is as good as yours. I'd be awfully tempted though to see if I couldn't solve a few problems at onceby dangling Delgado in a trade.Yeah, and I'd look into getting a better hitter behind the dish and not Castro, whose been unable to answer the bell at crucial times far too often.

My apologies for the infrequent updates: I briefly lost use of the home computer and haven't had a lot to report on. You may have seeen the Mets hired Luis Alicea to be their new first-base coach. He coached the Red Sox wearing No. 16 last year but I'd expect to see him -- along with Razor Shines -- take numbers in the low 50s.