Not Getting It

Leave it Yankee fans to find a way to interrupt my schafenfreude. After the Mets were rained out last night, I listened in with sick delight as the Rays dismantled the Yankees, 13-4. The beatdown was highlighted by a 6-run outburst against LaTroy Hawkins, the newly acquired veteran reliever off to a rotten start with the Yankees.

Stay classy, fellasThere’s not a true Met fan out there who didn’t chuckle to themselves when the Yanks made that acquisition, by the way. Hawkins was the pitcher who surrendered a 3-run, 9th-inning, game-tying bomb to Victor Diaz in the final week of the 2004 season, in a game that ultimately obliterated the Cubs’ run for the playoffs and provided about the only Mets’ highlight of that entire miserable year.

But back to last night. Yankee fans being Yankee fans, it’s not enough for them to be disgusted with, and unsupportive of, their players while they struggle. No, they have to hate Hawkins on a level beyond that for having the temerity to struggle while wearing (hush now) Paul O’Neill’s venerated No. 21. So while Hawkins was out there scuffling last night, he did so to a chorus of unsportsmanlike “Paul O’Neill!” chants.

Mets fans, don’t act like that.

Never mind the fact that Hawkins explained he’s wearing the number in honor of Roberto Clemente. That in itself ought to be reason enough to leave his choice alone. But somehow the Yankees and their fans have allowed the whole idea of re-issuing popular players’ numbers to become an affront to the former player’s dignity and an invitation to their fans to act disgracefully. The Yankees’ organizational habit of dubiously retiring numbers (Howard, Maris, and Jackson to name three) no doubt has conditioned fans to sniff out disrepect behind innocunous or even well-intentioned re-issues, while demanding they honor any or every pretty good but not great player who came through the organization and was fortunate enough to be a part of a championship team.

DISCLAIMER: Not all Yankee fans are like the guy above. Many don’t smoke. 

* The Mets’ rain-out last night sets up a delicious Santana-Glavine matchup for Sunday’s game, which we’ll be watching at Stout NYC (133 W. 33rd St.) for the Mets by the Numbers launch/viewing party. I’m told SNY’s Mets Weekly crew may be on hand. Hope to see you there too!

* I’ll be warming up for that event with a talk and book signing today (Saturday) at Barnes & Noble in Bayside, 3 p.m.


  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • StumbleUpon

One comment

  1. Jon Springer says:

    Submitted by metirish on Sat, 04/05/2008 – 7:54pm.
    You no doubt know by now that Smoltz will make the start Sunday , a true marquee match up.

    I didn’t see Hawkins get hammered by the Rays but wasn’t O’Neill in the TV booth? I wonder what he thought of the whole # thing, yankee fans of course could care less about Clemente..

    delete edit reply report to Mollom
    I thought I heard Kay ask

    Submitted by Jon Springer on Sun, 04/06/2008 – 7:47am.
    I thought I heard Kay ask PO about the number and he kinda said, “eh.” — as if he couldn’t come up with a tactful way to say it hurt his feelings. That’s just my guess however. I do know he could diffuse fan sentiment in a second by invoking the Clemente name.

    Today is suddenly a big game.

    delete edit reply report to Mollom
    To be fair, plenty of Met

    Submitted by SteveJRogers (not verified) on Mon, 04/07/2008 – 7:19pm.
    To be fair, plenty of Met fans do hate the fact that #17 is still not on the wall at Shea and has been used as a hot potato, especially in the last few years. Ditto with the way 16 and 18 have been used since being put back in circulation. Granted they’ve never been as vocal as Yankee fans were with Hawkins (they even booed him when he was introduced) and to make matters worse, I’ve seen comments on message boards where they believe Hawkins’ Clemente comments are bogus! Sounds like they would have rather have heard Hawkins go the route Mariano Rivera did when he didn’t know much about Robinson when MLB took 42 permanently out of circulation and would have rather Hawkins just be another “clueless about the game’s past” athlete (which is grossly unfair since this is their job and rarely are athletes fans, but that is another topic) so they can shame him into switching numbers. Could be worse though, he could have taken #51!

Leave a Reply to Jon Springer Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *